YAFI Online Programming // Disease State Management and Drug Therapy
DOAC- Associated Bleeding
Risks and Reversal Strategies
After participating in this activity, pharmacists will be able to:
- Describe the burden of illness from anticoagulant-associated severe bleeding
- Identify high-risk factors in DOAC-associated bleeding, including intracranial hemorrhage, GI bleeding and critical area or organ
- Describe reversal treatments for DOAC-associated bleeds
- Apply guidelines for reversing DOACs
- Discuss patient evaluation and institutional protocol concepts for DOAC reversal
After participating in this activity pharmacists and pharmacy technicians will be able to:
- Discover resources for patient information on anticoagulation and bleeding risk
- Identify the medications used in DOAC anticoagulation therapy
- Recall the medications used to reverse DOAC anticoagulation therapy
- Determine when to refer the patient to the pharmacist regarding DOAC anticoagulation therapy
Release Date: June 15, 2019
Expiration Date: December 15, 2021
19YC45-KBT92 Pharmacy Technician
2.0 hours of CE
The use of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) for the treatment and prevention of thromboembolic events has steadily increased. The DOACs offer an improved risk/benefit profile with regard to their comparable efficacy and decreased risk of bleeding compared to vitamin K antagonists. Despite their association with decreased risks of major bleeding, DOACs, as with all anticoagulant medications, put patients at risk of bleeding. Until recently, one advantage vitamin K antagonists possessed over DOACs was a drug-specific antidote to reverse their anticoagulant effects. The development of idarucizumab for dabigatran and andexanet alfa for rivaroxaban and apixaban has partially addressed this need. However, there is still no FDA-approved reversal agent for edoxaban or betrixaban. Furthermore, clinicians must consider key differences at the individual patient level regarding bleeding risk and management. The American College of Cardiology recently published a consensus decision pathway to help guide the management of oral anticoagulant-associated bleeding. This pathway is a useful tool in the management of DOACs, but the topic of DOAC-associated bleeding is a rapidly evolving topic, with new data becoming available, and further reversal agents in the pipeline.
|The University of Connecticut School of Pharmacy is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Pharmacy Education as a provider of continuing pharmacy education.|
Pharmacists and pharmacy technicians are eligible to participate in this application-based activity and will receive up to 0.2 CEU (2 contact hours) for completing the activity, passing the quiz with a grade of 70% or better, and completing an online evaluation. Statements of credit are available via the CPE Monitor on- line system and your participation will be recorded with CPE Monitor within 72 hours of submission
Grant funding: Portola Pharmaceuticals
Initial Release Date: June 15, 2019
Expiration Date: December 15, 2021
To obtain CPE credit, visit the UConn Online CE Center
Use your NABP E-profile ID and the session code 19YC45-FCT83 for pharmacists or 19YC45-KBT92for pharmacy technicians to access the online quiz and evaluation.
First- time users must pre-register in the Online CE Center. Test results will be displayed immediately and your participation will be recorded with CPE Monitor within 72 hours of completing the requirements.
For questions concerning the online CPE activities, email firstname.lastname@example.org
Brandon K. Martinez, PharmD, BCPS ; Cardiovascular Outcomes Research Fellow, Hartford Hospital Evidence Based Practice Center, Hartford, CT, University of Connecticut School of Pharmacy, Storrs, CT .
The author has no actual or potential conflicts of interest associated with this article.
Disclosure of Discussions of Off-label and Investigational Drug Use
This activity may contain discussion of off label/unapproved use of drugs. The content and views presented in this educational program are those of the faculty and do not necessarily represent those of the University of Connecticut School of Pharmacy. Please refer to the official prescribing information for each product for discussion of approved indications, contraindications, and warnings.
The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) +-estimates that more than 900,000 venous thromboembolism (VTE) events, including deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE), occur in the United States (US) annually. VTE is associated with high recurrence and mortality rate (60,000-100,000 Americans die from VTE each year).1 Additionally, approximately 2.7 million people in the US have nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF; see Sidebar, page 2) with the prevalence expected to grow to 12.1 million by 2030.2 Patients with atrial fibrillation are at an increased risk of stroke and systemic thromboembolic events.
Full List of References
1. CDC. Venous thromboembolism (blood clots) - data and statistics. https://www.cdc.gov/ncbddd/dvt/data.html. Updated February 5, 2018. Accessed April 10, 2019.
2. Benjamin EJ, Muntner P, Alonso A, et al. Heart disease and stroke statistics-2019 update: a report from the American Heart Association. Circuclation 2019;139:e56-e528.
3. Kearon C, Akl EA, Comerota AJ, et al; American College of Chest Physicians. Antithrombotic therapy for VTE disease: Antithrombotic Therapy and Prevention of Thrombosis, 9th ed: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines. Chest. 2012;141(2)(suppl):e419S-e494S.
4. Connolly SJ, Ezekowitz MD, Yusuf S, et al.; RELY Steering Committee and Investigators. Dabigatran versus warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med. 2009;361:1139–1151.
5. Patel MR, Mahaffey KW, Garg J, et al.; ROCKET AF Investigators. Rivaroxaban versus warfarin in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med. 2011;365:883–891.
6. Granger CB, Alexander JH, McMurray JJ, et al.; ARISTOTLE Committees and Investigators. Apixaban versus warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med. 2011;365:981–992.
7. Giugliano RP, Ruff CT, Braunwald E, et al.; ENGAGE AF-TIMI 48 Investigators. Edoxaban versus warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med. 2013;369:2093–2104.
8. Bauersachs R, Berkowitz SD, Brenner B, et al. Oral rivaroxaban for symptomatic venous thromboembolism. N Engl J Med. 2010;363:2499–2510.
9. Buller HR, Prins MH, Lensin AW, et al. Oral rivaroxaban for the treatment of symptomatic pulmonary embolism. N Engl J Med. 2012;366:1287–1297.
10. Schulman S, Kearon C, Kakkar AK, et al. Dabigatran versus warfarin in the treatment of acute venous thromboembolism. N Engl J Med. 2009;361:2342–2352.
11. Agnelli G, Buller HR, Cohen A, et al. Oral apixaban for the treatment of acute venous thromboembolism. N Engl J Med. 2013;369:799–808.
12. Barnes GD, Lucas E, Alexander GC, et al. National trends in ambulatory oral anticoagulant use. Am J Med. 2015;128:1300- 5.e2.
13. Mekaj YJ, Mekaj AY, Duci SB, et al. New oral anticoagulants: their advantages and disadvantages compared with vitamin K antagonists in the prevention and treatment of patients with thromboembolic events. Ther Clin Risk Manag. 2015;11:967-– 977.
14. Pradaxa (dabigatran etexilate mesylate) [package insert]. Ridgefield, CT: Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc; 2015
15. Xarelto (rivaroxaban) [package insert]. Titusville, NJ: Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc; 2019.
16. Eliquis (apixaban) [package insert]. Princeton, NJ: Bristol-Myers Squibb Company and New York, NY: Pfizer Inc; 2015
17. Savaysa (edoxaban) [package insert]. Parsippany, NJ: Daiichi Sankyo, Inc; 2015.
18. Bevyxxa (betrixaban) [package insert]. South San Francisco CA: Portola Pharmaceuticals, Inc; 2017.
19. Stangier J, Rathgen K, Stanhle H, et al. Influence of renal impairment on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of oral dabigatran etexilate: an open-label, parallel-group, single-centre study. Clin Pharmacokinet. 2010;49:259-268.
20. Chai-Adisaksopha C, Crowther M, Isayama T, et al. The impact of bleeding complications in patients receiving target-specific oral anticoagulants: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Blood. 2014;124:2450-2458.
21. Lip GYH, Keshishian A, Kamble S, et al. Real-world comparison of major bleeding risk among non-valvular atrial fibrillation patients initiated on apixaban, dabigatran, rivaroxaban, or warfarin a propensity score matched analysis. Thromb Haemost. 2016;116:975-986.
22. Lopez-Lopez JA, Sterne JAC, Thom HHZ, et al. Oral anticoagulants for prevention of stroke in atrial fibrillation: systematic review, network meta-analysis, and cost effectiveness analysis. BMJ. 2017;359:j5058.
23. Cohen AT, Harrington RA, Goldhaber SZ, et al. Extended thromboprophylaxis with betrixaban in acutely ill medical patients. N Engl J Med. 2016;375:534-544.
24. Holster L, Valkhoff VE, Kuipers EJ, et al. New oral anticoagulants increase risk for gastrointestinal bleeding: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Gasteroenterology. 2013;145:105-112.e15
25. Xu Y, Schulman S, Dowlatshahi, et al. Direct oral anticoagulant- or warfarin-related major bleeding characteristics, reversal strategies, and outcomes from a multicenter observational study. Chest. 2017;152:81-91.
26. Lip GY, Frison L, Halperin JL, et al. Comparative validation of a novel risk score for predicting bleeding risk in anticoagulated patients with atrial fibrillation: the HAS-BLED (Hypertension, Abnormal Renal/Liver Function, Stroke, Bleeding History or Predisposition, Labile INR, Elderly, Drugs/Alcohol Concomitantly) score. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011;57:173-180.
27. Fang MC, Go AS, Chang Y, et al. A new risk scheme to predict warfarin-associated hemorrhage: The ATRIA (Anticoagulation and Risk Factors in Atrial Fibrillation) Study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011;58:395-401.
28. Gage BF, Yan Y, Milligan PE, et al. Clinical classification schemes for predicting hemorrhage: results from the National Registry of Atrial Fibrillation (NRAF). Am Heart J. 2006;151:713- 719.
29. Abraham NS. Prevention of gastrointestinal bleeding in patients receiving direct oral anticoagulants. Am J Gastroenterol. 2016;3:2-12.
30. Witt DM, Nieuwlaat R, Clark NP, et al. American Society of Hematology 2018 guidelines for the management of venous thromboembolism: optimal management of anticoagulation therapy. Blood Adv. 2018;2:3257-3291.
31. Steffel J, Verhamme P, Potpara TS, et al. The 2018 European Heart Rhythm Association Practical Guide on the use of non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants in patients with atrial fibrillation. Eur Heart J. 2018;39:1330-1399.
32. January CT, Wann LS, Calkins H, et al. 2019 Focused Update on Atrial Fibrillation AHA/ACC/HRS focused update of the 2014 AHA/ACC/HRS guideline for the management of patients with atrial fibrillation: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines and the Heart Rhythm Society. Circulation. 2019;139.
33. Shih AW, Crowther MA. Reversal of direct oral anticoagulants: a practical approach. Hematology Am Soc Hematol Educ Program. 2016;2016:612-619.
34. Almegren M. Reversal of direct oral anticoagulants. Vasc Health Risk Manag. 2017;13:287-292.
35. Shaw JR. Pharmacological reversal of the direct oral anticoagulants. Res Pract Thromb Haemost. 2018;2:251-265.
36. Praxbind (idarucizumab) [package insert]. Ridgefield, CT: Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc; 2018.
37. Andexxa (coagulation factor Xa (recombinant), inactivatedzhzo) [package insert]. South San Francisco, CA: Portola Pharmaceuticals, Inc; 2018.
38. Glund S, Stangier J, Schmohl M, et al. Safety, tolerability, and efficacy of idarucizumab for the reversal of the anticoagulant effect of dabigatran in healthy male volunteers: a randomised, placebo-controlled, double-blind phase 1 trial. Lancet. 2015;386:680-690.
39. Glund S, Moschetti V, Norris S, et al. A randomised study in healthy volunteers to investigate the safety, tolerability and pharmacokinetics of idarucizumab, a specific antidote to dabigatran. Thromb Haemost. 2015;113:943-51.
40. Pollack Jr CV, Reilly PA, van Ryn J, et al. Idarucizumab for dabigatran reversal – full cohort analysis. N Engl J Med. 2017;377:431-41.
41. FDA. ANDEXXA (coagulation factor Xa (recombinant), inactivated-zhzo). Available at https://www.fda.gov/vaccines-bloodbiologics/cellular-gene-therapy-products/andexxa-coagulationfactor-xa-recombinant-inactivated-zhzo. Updated June 12, 2018. Accessed May 9, 2019.
42. Rogers KC, Finks SW. A new option for reversing anticoagulant effect of factor Xa inhibitors: andexanet alfa (ANDEXXA). Am J Med. 2019;132:38-41.
43. Connolly SJ, Crowther M, Eikelboom JW, et al. Full study report of andexanet alfa for bleeding associated with factor Xa inhibitors. N Engl J Med. 2019;380:1326-1335.
44. Siegal DM, Curnutte JT, Connolly SJ, et al. Andexanet Alfa for the Reversal of Factor Xa Inhibitor Activity. N Engl J Med. 2015;373:2413-24.
45. Portola Pharmaceuticals. U.S. Food and Drug Administration Approves Portola Pharmaceuticals’ Prior Approval Supplement for Andexxa® Generation 2 Manufacturing Process. Available at https://portola.gcs-web.com/node/10311/pdf. Updated December 31st, 2018. Accessed May 9, 2019.
46. Ansell JE, Bakhru SH, Laulicht BE, et al. Use of PER977 to reverse the anticoagulant effect of edoxaban. N Engl J Med. 2014;371:2141-2142m
47. Hoffman M, Goldstein JN, Levy JH. The impact of prothrombin complex concentrates when treating DOAC associated bleeding: a review. Int J Emerg Med. 2018;11:55m
48. Tomaselli GF, Mahaffey KW, Cuker A, et al. 2017 ACC Expert Consensus Decision Pathway on Management of Bleeding in Patients on Oral Anticoagulants: A Report of the American College of Cardiology Task Force on Expert Consensus Decision Pathways. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017;70:3042-3067.
49. American College of Cardiology. Guidance for Anticoagulation Reversal. Available at https://www.acc.org/~/media/NonClinical/Images/Tools%20and%20Practice%20Support/Mobile% 20Resources/ManageAnticoag/B18120_ManageAnticoag_App_ Fact_Sheet.pdf. Updated July 2018. Accessed April 10, 2019.
50. Connors JM. Testing and monitoring direct oral anticoagulants. Blood. 2018;132:2009-2015. 51. Conway SE, Hwang AY, Ponte CD, et al. Laboratory and clinical monitoring of direct acting oral anticoagulants: what clinicians need to know. Pharmacotherapy. 2017;37:236-248.