YAFI Online Programming // Disease State Management and Drug Therapy
Biosimilars in Inflammatory Conditions
After participating in this activity pharmacists will be able to:
- Describe the FDA process for approval of biosimilars
- Recognize key terminology of biosimilarity, interchangeability, totality of evidence, immunogenicity, extrapolation, and nocebo effect
- Compare biosimilars and approved reference products in inflammation for formulary decisions, patient monitoring, and delivering education to other healthcare providers
- Identify state pharmacy requirements for biosimilar substitution
After participating in this activity pharmacy technicians will be able to:
- Compare the cost savings of biosimilars to reference biologic products in inflammatory conditions
- Describe the difference between a biosimilar and a generic product
- Determine when to refer patients to the pharmacists for recommendations or referrals
Release Date: January 15, 2021
Expiration Date: January 15, 2023
21YC02-TXK44 Pharmacy Technician
2.0 hours of CE
Although biologics were used by only 2% of the population in 2019, they constituted 48% of all drug spending. Biosimilars, which are are biosimilar to an FDA-approved reference product, have the potential to save money for health systems and patients. Patients may prioritize biologic therapy over their small molecule therapies for common asymptomatic diseases like hypertension and hyperlipidemia for financial reasons. Pharmacists and technicians who understand which biosimilars are available and applicable state and federal laws can alert patients or their prescribers of the existence of a lower cost biosimilar. They can also dispel myths and combat nocebo effect.
|The University of Connecticut School of Pharmacy is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Pharmacy Education as a provider of continuing pharmacy education.|
Pharmacists and pharmacy technicians are eligible to participate in this application-based activity and will receive up to 0.2 CEU (2 contact hours) for completing the activity, passing the quiz with a grade of 70% or better, and completing an online evaluation. Statements of credit are available via the CPE Monitor on- line system and your participation will be recorded with CPE Monitor within 72 hours of submission
Grant funding: Pfizer
Initial Release Date: January 15, 2021
Expiration Date: January 15, 2023
To obtain CPE credit, visit the UConn Online CE Center
Use your NABP E-profile ID and the session code 21YC02-XXT33 for pharmacists or 21YC02-TXK44 for pharmacy technicians to access the online quiz and evaluation.
First- time users must pre-register in the Online CE Center. Test results will be displayed immediately and your participation will be recorded with CPE Mon- itor within 72 hours of completing the requirements.
For questions concerning the online CPE activities, email email@example.com
C. Michael White, Pharm.D., FCP, FCCP; Distinguished Professor and Head, Pharmacy Practice, University of Connecticut School of Pharmacy, Storrs, CT and Director, HOPES Collaborative Group, University of Connecticut and Hartford Hospital, Hartford, CT.
The author has no actual or potential conflicts of interest associated with this article.
Disclosure of Discussions of Off-label and Investigational Drug Use
This activity may contain discussion of off label/unapproved use of drugs. The content and views presented in this educational program are those of the faculty and do not necessarily represent those of the University of Connecticut School of Pharmacy. Please refer to the official prescribing information for each product for discussion of approved indications, contraindications, and warnings.
Most medications dispensed in the United States are small molecule drugs.1 They have simple structures with low molecular weights (e.g., ampicillin, atorvastatin, omeprazole, and ibuprofen). Aspirin, for example, is comprised of only 21 atoms.2 Small molecules are produced using simple chemical processes and it’s easy to make identical, stable copies called generics with which we are all familiar.3
Biologics (“Specialty Drugs”) are monoclonal antibodies, enzymes, or hormones comprised of polysaccharides, proteins, and nucleic acids.2,3 These chemical structures have high molecular weights as demonstrated by adalimumab, a biologic anti-inflammatory, containing 20,067 atoms.2 They have complex secondary and tertiary molecular folding structures and the existence or orientation of side groups that might be produced by one manufacturing process but not others.2,3
Research scientists genetically engineer living organisms or tissues to produce biologic products.3 They cultivate the most effective cell lines and then nurture them in strictly controlled environments to minimize variability. Skilled laboratory technicians then harvest, isolate, and purify the biologic entity from these cells/tissues. Specific cell lines are proprietary to the manufacturer (like a vineyard or a brewery having proprietary microorganism strains that give their products unique characteristics). The manufacturer also owns the growth conditions cells are exposed to. Given biologic products’ unique nature and their complexities, manufacturers who want to create exact copies of biologic products cannot do it unless they have access to the originator’s proprietary information (and they rarely do).3 As such, healthcare regulators cannot apply the Drug Price Competition and Patient Term Restoration Act of
1984 and no one can make generic versions of biologic products.4
Although biologic products were used by only 2% of the population in 2019, they constituted 48% of all drug spending.1 Biological drugs for inflammatory conditions like rheumatoid arthritis, psoriasis, and inflammatory bowel disease account for $187 of ‘drug spend’ per member per month in managed care organizations, by far the most-costly therapeutic class in 2019. Cancer spending was only $75 per member per month in 2019. Not only that; spending on inflammatory disorders rose 17% from the year before and the trend in 2020 was even greater.1 In total, biologic products have accounted for 93% of the increase in drug costs since 2014 in the US.1,2
Full List of References
1. Express Scripts. 2019 Drug Trend Report. Available at: https://www.express-scripts.com/corporate/drug-trendreport#2019-in-review. Accessed: 8/28/2020.
2. Roy A. Biologic Medicines: The Biggest Driver Of Rising Drug Prices. Forbes. Mar 8, 2019. Available at: https://www.forbes.com/sites/theapothecary/2019/03/08/biologic-medicines-the-biggest-driver-of-rising-drugprices/#23982e6a18b0 Accessed: 8/31/2020.
3. Biologics and Biosimilars: An Overview. Amgen Inc. 2014: Pg 1-48.
4. Food and Drug Administration. Hatch-Waxman Letters. Available at: https://www.fda.gov/drugs/abbreviated-new-drug-applicationanda/hatch-waxman-letters Accessed 8/31/2020.
5. Food and Drug Administration. Biosimilar and Interchangeable Products. Available at: https://www.fda.gov/drugs/biosimilars/biosimilar-andinterchangeable-products#interchange Accessed 8/31/2020.
6. Rudrapatna VA, Velayos F. Biosimilars for the Treatment of Inflammatory Bowel Disease. Pract Gastroenterol. 2019; 43: 84–91. PMID: 31435122.
7. Food and Drug Administration. Purple Book: Lists of Licensed Biological Products with Reference Product Exclusivity and Biosimilarity or Interchangeability Evaluations. 8/3/2020. Available at: https://www.fda.gov/drugs/therapeutic-biologics-applicationsbla/purple-book-lists-licensed-biological-products-referenceproduct-exclusivity-and-biosimilarity-or Accessed: 8/31/2020.
8. McGowan S, Lozano R. Biosimilars: Market Insights and Growth Factors. AmeriSource Bergen. 9/19/2019. Available at: https://www.amerisourcebergen.com/insights/manufacturers/biosimilars-market-insights-andgrowthfactors#:~:text=The%20market%20experienced%20a%20boom,and%20now%20averages%2031%25.%22 Accessed:
9. Fortune Business Insights. US Biosimilar Market Trends 2019. Available at: https://www.fortunebusinessinsights.com/industryreports/u-s-biosimilars-market-100990 Accessed: 8/31/2020.
10. Mulcahy AW, Jakub P. Hlavka JP, Case SR Biosimilar Cost Savings in the United States: Initial Experience and Future Potential. Rand Health Q 2018;7:3. PMID: 30083415
11. Chase L. A Guide to Biosimilar Prices: How Much They Cost and How You Can Save. 4/14/2020. Available at: https://www.goodrx.com/blog/biosimilars-prices-how-much-theycost-how-to-save/. Accessed: 8/31/2020.
12. Lubberts E, van den Berg WB. Cytokines in the Pathogenesis of Rheumatoid Arthritis and Collagen-Induced Arthritis. Madame Curie Bioscience Database [Internet]. Austin (TX): Landes Bioscience; 2000-2013. Available at: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK6288/ Accessed:
13. Inflectra (infliximab-dyyb) Package Insert. Pfizer Laboratories, NY, NY. 6/2019.
14. Interleukin. (n.d.) Farlex Partner Medical Dictionary. (2012). Available at: https://medicaldictionary.thefreedictionary.com/interleukin Accessed: 9/2/2020.
15. Gingele S, Skripuletz T, Jacobs R. Role of CD20+ T cells in multiple sclerosis: implications for treatment with ocrelizumab. Neural Regen Res. 2020;15: 663–664. doi: 10.4103/1673-5374.266913
16. Merriam-Webster Dictionary. Available at: https://www.merriamwebster.com/dictionary/integrin Accessed: 9/2/2020.
17. Curtis JR, Singh JA. The Use of Biologics in Rheumatoid Arthritis: Current and Emerging Paradigms of Care. Clin Ther. 2011 Jun; 33(6): 679–707. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2011.05.044
18. WebMD. Biologics for Treating Rheumatoid Arthritis. Available at: https://www.webmd.com/rheumatoidarthritis/biologics#:~:text=The%20most%20common%20side%20effects%20are%20a%20runny,infections%20like%20the%20flu%20and%20cold%20sores%20 Accessed: 9/3/2020.
19. WebMD. Biologic and Biosimilar Medications for Psoriasis. Available at: https://www.webmd.com/skin-problems-andtreatments/psoriasis/biologic medications-psoriasis Accessed: 9/1/2020.
20. WebMD. How are biologic therapies used for inflammatory bowel disease? Available at: https://www.webmd.com/ibd-crohnsdisease/qa/how-are-biologic-therapies-used-for-inflammatorybowel-disease Accessed: 9/1/2020.
21. Healthline. How Do I Know If Biologics Will Work for My AS? Available at: https://www.healthline.com/health/beyond-back-painwith-as/will biologics-work#1. Accessed: 9/2/2020.
22. Rowland C. Why price of Humira keeps rising despite FDA approval of generic competition. Washington Post 1/8/2020. Available at:
https://www.washingtonpost.com/business/economy/whyhumiras-price-keeps-rising-despite-fda-approval-of-genericcompetition/2020/01/07/549ed0ce-2e3a-11ea-bcb3-ac6482c4a92f_story.html Accessed: 9/1/2020.
23. White CM. Potential benefits and risks of value-based pricing of prescription drugs. Connecticut Medicine 2017;81:587-595.
24. Quintiles IMS. The Impact of Biosimilar Competition in Europe. May 2017. Available at: http://ec.europa.eu/DocsRoom/documents/23102. Accessed
25. Saltz I. Pfizer Submits Citizen Petition to FDA Regarding Communications About Biosimilars. Big Molecule Watch 8/2018. Available at: https://www.bigmoleculewatch.com/2018/08/29/pfizersubmits-citizen-petition-to-fda-regarding-communications-aboutbiosimilars/#:~:text=On%20August%2022%2C%202018%2C%20Pfizer%20submitted%20a%20citizen,and%20effectiveness%20of%20
biosimilars%20relative%20to%20reference%20products. Accessed: 9/3/2020.
26. Cohen HP, McCabe D. The Importance of Countering Biosimilar Disparagement and Misinformation. BioDrugs. 2020; 34(4): 407–414. doi: 10.1007/s40259-020-00433-y
27. Razanskaite V, Bettey M, Louise Downey L, et al. Biosimilar Infliximab in Inflammatory Bowel Disease: Outcomes of a Managed Switching Programme. J Crohns Colitis 2017 Jun 1;11(6):690-696. doi: 10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjw216.
28. Tweehuysen L, Huiskes VJ, van den Bemt BJ, et al. Open‐Label, Non‐Mandatory Transitioning From Originator Etanercept to Bio‐similar SB4: Six‐Month Results From a Controlled Cohort Study. Arth Rheumatol 2018;70:1408-18. https://doi.org/10.1002/art.40516
29. Barbier L, Ebbers HC, Declerck P, et al. The Efficacy, Safety, and Immunogenicity of Switching Between Reference Biopharmaceuticals and Biosimilars: A Systematic Review. Clin Pharmacol Ther 2020. doi: 10.1002/cpt.1836.
30. Wolpert L. Science: mine’s a placebo and tonic. Independent 2001;January 12:8.
31. Schardt D. Food allergies. Center for Science in the Public Interest Nutrition Action Health Letter 2001;28:10-3.
32. Newman CB, Preiss D, Tobert JA, et al; American Heart Association Clinical Lipidology, Lipoprotein, Metabolism and Thrombosis Committee, a Joint Committee of the Council on Atherosclerosis, Thrombosis and Vascular Biology and Council on Lifestyle and Cardiometabolic Health; Council on Cardiovascular Disease in the Young; Council on Clinical Cardiology; and Stroke Council. Statin safety and associated adverse events: A scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2019;39(2):e38-e81. doi: 10.1161/ATV.0000000000000073. Erratum in: Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2019;39(5):e158.
33. Kinser PA.Therapeutic placebo effect: a mind/body connection (http://students.haverford.edu/pkinser/neuro-placebo.htm). Accessed Mar 2001.
34. European Medicines Agency and the European Commission. Biosimilars in the EU-Information guide for healthcare professionals (October 2019). Available at: https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/documents/leaflet/biosimilarseu-information-guide-healthcare-professionals_en.pdf. Accessed:
35. Kirchhoff SM. Specialty Drugs: Background and Policy Concerns. Congressional Research Service. August 3, 2015; 7-5700 (R44132).
36. American Pharmaceutical Association. Medication Adherence. Available at: https://www.pharmacist.com/medication-adherence
37. Curkendall S, Patel V, Gleeson M, et al. Compliance with biologic therapies for rheumatoid arthritis: Do patient out‐of‐pocket pay‐
ments matter? Arthritis Care & Research 2008;59:1519-26. https://doi.org/10.1002/art.24114
38. Mintz Levin Corporation. State biosimilar substitution laws. August 2019. Available at: https://www.mintz.com/sites/default/files/media/documents/2019-02-08/State%20Legislation%20on%20Biosimilars.pdf Accessed 9/2/2020.
39. Beck M, Michel B, Rybarczyk-Vigouret MC, et al. Knowledge, behaviors and practices of community and hospital pharmacists towards biosimilar medicines: Results of a French web-based survey. MAbs 2017;9:384–391. DOI: 10.1080/19420862.2016.1267087